Deeral, Erica (On Behalf of Herself & the Gamaay Peoples) & Ors v Charlie, Gordon & Ors (No electronic copy for attachments) [1997] FCA 1408
As all interested parties agreed following extensive mediation, supported by anthropological evidence and a pre-existing statutory grant, and as the application fulfilled the legal requirements, it is appropriate for the Court to determine that native title exists over the land and waters subject to the application.
- Parties
- Applicants: Erica Deeral (on behalf of herself and the Gamaay Peoples), Phillip Baru (on behalf of himself and the Dingaal Peoples), Bertie Gordon (on behalf of himself and the Nugal Peoples), Herman Bambie (on behalf of himself and the Thuubi Peoples), Brian Cobus (on behalf of himself and the Nguurruumungu Peoples), Wayne Coats (on behalf of himself and the Dharrpa Peoples), Pat Wallace (on behalf of himself and the Binhthi Peoples), Eddie Deemal (on behalf of himself and the Thiithaarr Peoples), Hector Michael (on behalf of himself and the Thanil Peoples), George Rosendale (on behalf of himself and the Nguymbaarr Nguymbaarr Peoples), Terrence Jacko (on behalf of himself and the Ngaatha Peoples), Martin James (on behalf of himself and the Gulaal Peoples), Bertie Gordon, Herman Bambie, Pat Wallace, Eddie Deemal and Terrence Jacko in their representative capacities jointly on behalf of the Buurnga Peoples; First Respondent: Gordon Charlie; Second Respondent: State of Queensland; Third Respondent: Hopevale Aboriginal Council; Fourth Respondent: Cape Flattery Silica Mines Pty Limited; Fifth Respondent: Cook Shire Council; Sixth Respondent: Far North Queensland Electricity Corporation; Seventh Respondent: Telstra Corporation Limited; Eighth Respondent: Robert William Dunn by his agent the Queensland Commercial Fishermen's Organisation; Ninth Respondent: Australian Maritime Safety Authority; Tenth Respondent: Cape York Land Council Aboriginal Corporation
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 December 1997
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Native Title Determination / Determination Following Agreement Under S 87 Native Title Act
- Outcome
- Determination of native title rights and interests made in favour of the applicants (the Hopevale clans) as per the agreed terms.
- Legal Topics
- Native Title Determination, Mediation Agreement, Hopevale Land, Federal Court Orders, S 87 Native Title Act
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Erica Deeral (on behalf of herself and the Gamaay Peoples), Phillip Baru (on behalf of himself and the Dingaal Peoples), Bertie Gordon (on behalf of himself and the Nugal Peoples), Herman Bambie (on behalf of himself and the Thuubi Peoples), Brian Cobus (on behalf of himself and the Nguurruumungu Peoples), Wayne Coats (on behalf of himself and the Dharrpa Peoples), Pat Wallace (on behalf of himself and the Binhthi Peoples), Eddie Deemal (on behalf of himself and the Thiithaarr Peoples), Hector Michael (on behalf of himself and the Thanil Peoples), George Rosendale (on behalf of himself and the Nguymbaarr Nguymbaarr Peoples), Terrence Jacko (on behalf of himself and the Ngaatha Peoples), Martin James (on behalf of himself and the Gulaal Peoples), Bertie Gordon, Herman Bambie, Pat Wallace, Eddie Deemal and Terrence Jacko in their representative capacities jointly on behalf of the Buurnga Peoples
Applicants
Gordon Charlie
First Respondent
State of Queensland
Second Respondent
Hopevale Aboriginal Council
Third Respondent
Cape Flattery Silica Mines Pty Limited
Fourth Respondent
Cook Shire Council
Fifth Respondent
Far North Queensland Electricity Corporation
Sixth Respondent
Telstra Corporation Limited
Seventh Respondent
Robert William Dunn by his agent the Queensland Commercial Fishermen's Organisation
Eighth Respondent
Australian Maritime Safety Authority
Ninth Respondent
Cape York Land Council Aboriginal Corporation
Tenth Respondent
Procedural Posture
Application for Native Title Determination / Determination Following Agreement Under S 87 Native Title Act
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is appropriate for the Court to make a determination of native title by agreement under s 87 of the Native Title Act 1993
Ratio Decidendi
As all interested parties agreed following extensive mediation, supported by anthropological evidence and a pre-existing statutory grant, and as the application fulfilled the legal requirements, it is appropriate for the Court to determine that native title exists over the land and waters subject to the application.
Court Disposition
Determination of native title rights and interests made in favour of the applicants (the Hopevale clans) as per the agreed terms.
Orders
- A determination of native title be made in the terms of the determination annexed to the reasons.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment