NAVH v Minister for Immigration & Citizenship [2007] FCA 373
The applicant's Federal Magistrates Court application was filed on 29 August 2006, outside the statutory time limits, and the Federal Magistrate had no power to extend time. The Federal Magistrate was not in error in dismissing the application, no other course was open, and any appeal would have no prospects of success.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal in Migration Judicial Review Proceedings Concerning Refusal of a Protection Visa / Leave to Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'refugee Review Tribunal' 'judicial Review' 'time Limits for Migration Litigation' 'leave to Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal in Migration Judicial Review Proceedings Concerning Refusal of a Protection Visa / Leave to Appeal From the Federal Magistrates Court of Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the application to the Federal Magistrates Court was filed within the applicable time limits under s 477 of the Migration Act.' 'Whether the Federal Magistrate erred in dismissing the application as out of time.' 'Whether the proposed appeal had any prospects of success.']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's Federal Magistrates Court application was filed on 29 August 2006, outside the statutory time limits, and the Federal Magistrate had no power to extend time. The Federal Magistrate was not in error in dismissing the application, no other course was open, and any appeal would have no prospects of success.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['The application for leave to appeal is dismissed with costs.' "The respondent's name be amended to Minister for Immigration & Citizenship." 'The Refugee Review Tribunal be added as the second respondent.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment