Azar v Ritchie & Anor [2006] NSWIRComm 295
The judge declined to disqualify himself, reasoning that neither his brother-in-law nor sister were involved directly with the proceedings or issues under appeal, and the association was too remote to give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias based on the principles from Ebner and Smits v Roach.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 September 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Disqualification of Judge
- Outcome
- Application for disqualification declined
- Legal Topics
- ['apprehended Bias' 'judicial Disqualification']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Interlocutory Application for Disqualification of Judge
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the judge should disqualify himself due to apprehended bias based on familial association with the solicitors acting for the respondents.']
Ratio Decidendi
The judge declined to disqualify himself, reasoning that neither his brother-in-law nor sister were involved directly with the proceedings or issues under appeal, and the association was too remote to give rise to a reasonable apprehension of bias based on the principles from Ebner and Smits v Roach.
Court Disposition
Application for disqualification declined
Orders
- ['Application for disqualification of judge is refused.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment