sarwar v michael pagesarwar v michael page [2001] NSWCC 71
The applicant did not suffer a psychological injury for which compensation is payable as any psychological harm was caused by reasonable action taken in relation to her dismissal. The physical injury claims (from the printer lid incident) were not substantiated as causing incapacity or necessitating treatment. The evidence favored the respondents and the applicant is not entitled to any compensation or expenses claimed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 May 2001
- Procedural Posture
- Workers Compensation Claim / Judgment
- Outcome
- Award in favour of both respondents; applicant’s claims dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['psychological Injury' 'sexual Harassment' 'termination of Employment' 'reasonable Action of Employer']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Workers Compensation Claim / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether applicant suffered psychological injury arising out of or in the course of employment' 'Whether any injury was caused by reasonable action of employer under s 11A of the Act' 'Entitlement to compensation for physical injury to head, neck, and shoulders']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant did not suffer a psychological injury for which compensation is payable as any psychological harm was caused by reasonable action taken in relation to her dismissal. The physical injury claims (from the printer lid incident) were not substantiated as causing incapacity or necessitating treatment. The evidence favored the respondents and the applicant is not entitled to any compensation or expenses claimed.
Court Disposition
Award in favour of both respondents; applicant’s claims dismissed.
Orders
- ['Award for first respondent' 'Award for second respondent']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment