Nazmul Nisha Khan v Shinwoo Kang and Sung Ju Lee trading as SK Floor Sanding [2014] NSWCATCD 237
The work performed by the respondents was not carried out in a proper and workmanlike manner, as required by statutory warranties implied under s 18B of the Home Building Act 1989. The applicant was therefore entitled to compensation for rectification ($3,600.00) and for excess timber purchased due to respondents’...
Source-derived case information.
- Parties
- Applicant: Nazmul Nisha Khan; Respondent: Shinwoo Kang; Respondent: Sung Ju Lee trading as SK Floor Sanding
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 December 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Building Claim / Hearing After Appeal and Remission
- Outcome
- Applicant substantially succeeds
- Legal Topics
- Defective Work, Statutory Warranties, Measurement Dispute, Relief From Payment
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nazmul Nisha Khan
Applicant
Shinwoo Kang
Respondent
Sung Ju Lee trading as SK Floor Sanding
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Building Claim / Hearing After Appeal and Remission
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the respondents carried out defective work in breach of statutory warranties
- 2 Whether the applicant is entitled to compensation for rectification and over-ordering timber
- 3 Whether the applicant is entitled to relief from payment of $3,100.00
Ratio Decidendi
The work performed by the respondents was not carried out in a proper and workmanlike manner, as required by statutory warranties implied under s 18B of the Home Building Act 1989. The applicant was therefore entitled to compensation for rectification ($3,600.00) and for excess timber purchased due to respondents’ incorrect measurement ($800.00). Claim for relief from payment of $3,100.00 failed as respondents’ work was found to be substantially complete.
Court Disposition
Applicant substantially succeeds
Orders
- The respondents must pay the applicant $4,400.00 within fourteen days of the date of this order.
- Any application for costs must be made within fourteen days of the date of this order.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment