NBCN v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 659
The applicant failed to establish any arguable ground of appeal or jurisdictional error. The Tribunal's factual findings on credibility were open to it, and statutory procedures were complied with. No sufficient doubt attended the decision below to warrant granting leave to appeal.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 May 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Migration / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Interlocutory Order
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['protection Visa' 'judicial Review' 'natural Justice' 'procedural Fairness' 'leave to Appeal']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Migration / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Interlocutory Order
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Federal Magistrate erred by failing to find a breach of natural justice' 'Whether the Tribunal failed to comply with natural justice and relevant statutory provisions under the Migration Act' 'Whether decision below was attended by sufficient doubt to warrant grant of leave to appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant failed to establish any arguable ground of appeal or jurisdictional error. The Tribunal's factual findings on credibility were open to it, and statutory procedures were complied with. No sufficient doubt attended the decision below to warrant granting leave to appeal.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal dismissed
Orders
- ["The name of the first respondent be amended to 'Minister for Immigration and Citizenship.'" 'The Refugee Review Tribunal be joined as second respondent.' 'The application for leave to appeal be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the first respondent's costs, fixed at $1,200."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment