NBMO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 241
It would be inappropriate to grant an interim injunction under s 46PP because the relevant 'status quo' referred to in the Act was the applicant’s detention pending removal, not general presence in Australia, and because there is no real prospect that the applicant might secure a protection visa or other beneficial outcome through conciliation.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 February 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interim Injunction / Judgment at First Instance
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['interim Injunctions' 'immigration Detention' 'section 46 PP Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Interim Injunction / Judgment at First Instance
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court should grant an interim injunction under s 46PP of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth) to restrain removal of the applicant from Australia while a conciliation process is ongoing']
Ratio Decidendi
It would be inappropriate to grant an interim injunction under s 46PP because the relevant 'status quo' referred to in the Act was the applicant’s detention pending removal, not general presence in Australia, and because there is no real prospect that the applicant might secure a protection visa or other beneficial outcome through conciliation.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs." "The name of the respondent be amended to the 'Minister for Immigration and Citizenship'."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment