NBMO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 241

NBMO v Minister for Immigration and Citizenship [2007] FCA 241

It would be inappropriate to grant an interim injunction under s 46PP because the relevant 'status quo' referred to in the Act was the applicant’s detention pending removal, not general presence in Australia, and because there is no real prospect that the applicant might secure a protection visa or other beneficial outcome through conciliation.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 February 2007
Procedural Posture
Application for Interim Injunction / Judgment at First Instance
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['interim Injunctions' 'immigration Detention' 'section 46 PP Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Interim Injunction / Judgment at First Instance

  1. 1 ['Whether the Court should grant an interim injunction under s 46PP of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth) to restrain removal of the applicant from Australia while a conciliation process is ongoing']

Ratio Decidendi

It would be inappropriate to grant an interim injunction under s 46PP because the relevant 'status quo' referred to in the Act was the applicant’s detention pending removal, not general presence in Australia, and because there is no real prospect that the applicant might secure a protection visa or other beneficial outcome through conciliation.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.' "The applicant pay the respondent's costs." "The name of the respondent be amended to the 'Minister for Immigration and Citizenship'."]