NC v Commission for Children and Young People [2005] NSWADT 139
The applicant does not pose a real and appreciable risk to children under s 9(4). Consequently, the Child Protection (Prohibited Employment) Act 1998 is not to apply to NC in respect of the offence of indecent assault for which he was committed to an institution on 30 December 1960.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 23 June 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Declaration (child Protection/employment) / Final Determination
- Outcome
- Application allowed
- Legal Topics
- ['prohibited Employment' 'risk Assessment for Child Related Work' 'sexual Offences' 'alcohol Related Offences' 'tribunal Procedure']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Declaration (child Protection/employment) / Final Determination
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the applicant poses a risk to the safety of children under s 9(4) Child Protection (Prohibited Employment) Act 1998' 'Whether the Child Protection (Prohibited Employment) Act 1998 should apply to NC in respect of his historical offence']
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant does not pose a real and appreciable risk to children under s 9(4). Consequently, the Child Protection (Prohibited Employment) Act 1998 is not to apply to NC in respect of the offence of indecent assault for which he was committed to an institution on 30 December 1960.
Court Disposition
Application allowed
Orders
- ['The Child Protection (Prohibited Employment) Act 1998 is not to apply to NC in respect of the offence of indecent assault for which he was committed to an institution on 30 December 1960.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment