NCFS Properties P/L v Hawkins [2000] NSWSC 485
The Plaintiff’s application to set aside the statutory demand was made within the statutory twenty-one day period as calculated by s105 of the Corporations Law, and the statutory demand was plausibly issued by a party lacking privity of contract, warranting the setting aside of the demand.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: NCFS Properties P/L; Defendant: David Charles Hawkins
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 29 May 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Equity Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Judgment
- Outcome
- Plaintiff succeeds. Statutory demand set aside.
- Legal Topics
- S459 G Applications, Statutory Demand, Measurement of Time
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
NCFS Properties P/L
Plaintiff
David Charles Hawkins
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Equity Application to Set Aside Statutory Demand / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application to set aside the statutory demand was made within the twenty-one day period mandated by s459G of the Corporations Law
- 2 Whether the statutory demand was issued by the proper creditor
- 3 Whether the Termination Agreement was executed by the Plaintiff
Ratio Decidendi
The Plaintiff’s application to set aside the statutory demand was made within the statutory twenty-one day period as calculated by s105 of the Corporations Law, and the statutory demand was plausibly issued by a party lacking privity of contract, warranting the setting aside of the demand.
Court Disposition
Plaintiff succeeds. Statutory demand set aside.
Orders
- Orders in terms of paragraph 1 of the Plaintiff's Summons of 6 April 2000.
- The costs of the Plaintiff shall be paid by the Defendant.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment