Yee v Vu [2003] NSWSC 114

Yee v Vu [2003] NSWSC 114

The Supreme Court has limited jurisdiction over Tribunal decisions; no error of law or denial of procedural fairness was identified, so any application to the Court is doomed to fail; summons dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 February 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Judgment
Outcome
summons dismissed
Legal Topics
['appeal From Statutory Tribunal' 'jurisdiction' 'procedural Fairness']
['landlord & Tenant' 'administrative Law'] ['appeal From Statutory Tribunal' 'jurisdiction' 'procedural Fairness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether the Supreme Court has jurisdiction to hear the appeal from Consumer Trader & Tenancy Tribunal decisions.' 'Whether there has been a denial of procedural fairness in the Tribunal proceedings.']

Ratio Decidendi

The Supreme Court has limited jurisdiction over Tribunal decisions; no error of law or denial of procedural fairness was identified, so any application to the Court is doomed to fail; summons dismissed.

Court Disposition

summons dismissed

Orders

  • ['The summons filed on 20 December 2002 is dismissed.' 'The order made by Adams J on 15 January 2003 in relation to delivery of key is discharged.' "The appellant is ordered to pay one-half of the respondent's costs of the summons."]