Ghodskani v United States of America [2018] FCA 14

Ghodskani v United States of America [2018] FCA 14

The Magistrate's conclusion that the applicant posed a real risk of flight was not unreasonable, illogical or irrational. The Magistrate correctly applied the statutory and judicial principles relevant to the grant of bail in extradition proceedings under the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth). The weighing of relevant factors and the assessment of risk of flight were properly and lawfully undertaken. No jurisdictional error was established.

Parties
Applicant: Negar Ghodskani; First Respondent: United States of America; Second Respondent: Lynette Duncan
Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
22 January 2018
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review Application / Final Judgment
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
Bail in Extradition Proceedings, Judicial Review, Jurisdictional Error
Extradition Administrative Law Bail in Extradition Proceedings Judicial Review Jurisdictional Error

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 13 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Negar Ghodskani

Applicant

United States of America

First Respondent

Lynette Duncan

Second Respondent

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review Application / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the Magistrate's decision refusing bail was affected by jurisdictional error
  2. 2 Whether the Magistrate's conclusion that the applicant posed a real risk of flight was unreasonable, illogical or irrational
  3. 3 Whether the Magistrate applied the wrong test regarding risk of flight

Ratio Decidendi

The Magistrate's conclusion that the applicant posed a real risk of flight was not unreasonable, illogical or irrational. The Magistrate correctly applied the statutory and judicial principles relevant to the grant of bail in extradition proceedings under the Extradition Act 1988 (Cth). The weighing of relevant factors and the assessment of risk of flight were properly and lawfully undertaken. No jurisdictional error was established.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • The application be dismissed.
  • In relation to costs, each of the applicant and first respondent file and serve a written submission (of no more than two pages) within 14 days.