NEIL GIBSON v JOHN EDWIN EASTGATE & ANOR [2008] NSWCA 81
A passive co-owner who does not hold an owner-builder's permit, has not participated in construction, and is prohibited by statute from carrying out residential building work, does not owe a duty of care to subsequent purchasers for latent defects causing economic loss.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 April 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal Decision
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['negligence' 'duty of Care' 'economic Loss' 'owner Builder Liability']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Leave to Appeal and Substantive Appeal Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a passive co-owner who does not hold an owner-builder permit and does not participate in building activities owes a duty of care to subsequent purchasers for latent defects causing economic loss']
Ratio Decidendi
A passive co-owner who does not hold an owner-builder's permit, has not participated in construction, and is prohibited by statute from carrying out residential building work, does not owe a duty of care to subsequent purchasers for latent defects causing economic loss.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal granted; appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted.' 'Filing and service of notice of appeal dispensed with.' 'Appeal dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment