Camm v R [2009] NSWCCA 141

Camm v R [2009] NSWCCA 141

There was evidence to support the sentencing judge’s findings regarding the roles and criminality of the appellant and co-offenders. Differences in charges, maximum penalties, and pleas justified difference in sentences. No demonstrated error in the findings or approach to delay as a mitigating factor. As such, none of the grounds of appeal were made out and the sentence should stand.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
15 May 2009
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence, Judgment on Leave and Substantive Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal against sentence dismissed.
Legal Topics
['sentencing' 'parity of Sentence' 'findings of Fact' 'prosecutorial Discretion' 'delay as Mitigation']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence, Judgment on Leave and Substantive Appeal

  1. 1 ['Whether there was manifest disparity between the sentence imposed on the appellant and that imposed on co-offenders' "Whether the sentencing judge erred in findings of fact relevant to the appellant's criminality" 'Whether delay in prosecution was not adequately considered as mitigation']

Ratio Decidendi

There was evidence to support the sentencing judge’s findings regarding the roles and criminality of the appellant and co-offenders. Differences in charges, maximum penalties, and pleas justified difference in sentences. No demonstrated error in the findings or approach to delay as a mitigating factor. As such, none of the grounds of appeal were made out and the sentence should stand.

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal against sentence dismissed.

Orders

  • ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal against sentence dismissed']