Camm v R [2009] NSWCCA 141
There was evidence to support the sentencing judge’s findings regarding the roles and criminality of the appellant and co-offenders. Differences in charges, maximum penalties, and pleas justified difference in sentences. No demonstrated error in the findings or approach to delay as a mitigating factor. As such, none of the grounds of appeal were made out and the sentence should stand.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 15 May 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence, Judgment on Leave and Substantive Appeal
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal against sentence dismissed.
- Legal Topics
- ['sentencing' 'parity of Sentence' 'findings of Fact' 'prosecutorial Discretion' 'delay as Mitigation']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence, Judgment on Leave and Substantive Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether there was manifest disparity between the sentence imposed on the appellant and that imposed on co-offenders' "Whether the sentencing judge erred in findings of fact relevant to the appellant's criminality" 'Whether delay in prosecution was not adequately considered as mitigation']
Ratio Decidendi
There was evidence to support the sentencing judge’s findings regarding the roles and criminality of the appellant and co-offenders. Differences in charges, maximum penalties, and pleas justified difference in sentences. No demonstrated error in the findings or approach to delay as a mitigating factor. As such, none of the grounds of appeal were made out and the sentence should stand.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal against sentence granted. Appeal against sentence dismissed.
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal granted' 'Appeal against sentence dismissed']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment