Rechlin v Glendinning Management Consultations Australia Pty Limited [2012] NSWSC 1261
On the proper construction of s 4(2)(a)(iii) of the Long Service Leave Act 1955, an employer is not confined to evidence known at the time of dismissal to establish that an employee was dismissed for serious and wilful misconduct. Both employers and employees may rely on after acquired information relevant to...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 October 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['long Service Leave' 'statutory Interpretation' 'dismissal for Misconduct']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether an employer can rely on after acquired information to establish serious and wilful misconduct under s 4(2)(a)(iii) Long Service Leave Act 1955' 'Proper construction of s 4(2)(a)(iii) of the Long Service Leave Act 1955']
Ratio Decidendi
On the proper construction of s 4(2)(a)(iii) of the Long Service Leave Act 1955, an employer is not confined to evidence known at the time of dismissal to establish that an employee was dismissed for serious and wilful misconduct. Both employers and employees may rely on after acquired information relevant to whether the serious and wilful misconduct in fact occurred; the section is concerned with whether such misconduct occurred, not how it is proved.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- ["The appeal is dismissed. Unless the parties approach within 14 days, Mr Rechlin is to bear the Company's costs of the appeal, as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment