ABREU v R [2007] NSWCCA 267
Notwithstanding an identified error in the approach to sentencing in relation to the application of Pearce, the circumstances and seriousness of the applicant's offending, his criminal history, and the total sentence imposed do not justify appellate intervention or a reduction in sentence. Leave to appeal is refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 September 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- Leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- ['appeal Against Sentence' 'break and Enter' 'larceny' 'totality' 'multiple Offences']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the sentencing judge incorrectly applied Pearce regarding totality and individualised sentencing for multiple offences' 'Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive']
Ratio Decidendi
Notwithstanding an identified error in the approach to sentencing in relation to the application of Pearce, the circumstances and seriousness of the applicant's offending, his criminal history, and the total sentence imposed do not justify appellate intervention or a reduction in sentence. Leave to appeal is refused.
Court Disposition
Leave to appeal refused
Orders
- ['Leave to appeal refused']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment