Silva v Ku-ring-gai Council [2009] NSWLEC 1060
On the balance of the evidence, including site observations, aerial photographs, topography, hydrological modelling, bed and bank features, erosion features, flow, sediment processes, aquatic fauna and prior riparian vegetation, the watercourse at 27 Miowera Road was a natural feature artificially modified and a river under the Water Management Act 2000. The development application therefore required treatment as integrated development and involved a controlled activity, lacked support from the Department of Water and Energy, and in any event was inconsistent with ecologically sustainable development, the objects and principles of the Water Management Act 2000, DCP 38, DCP 47 and Council...
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 06 March 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal Following Refusal of Development Application Da0415/08 to Pipe an Existing Open Channel Watercourse / Section 34 Conciliation Conference Terminated; Parties Agreed to Adjudication Under S 34(4)(b) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Judgment Under S 34(5)
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed; development consent refused
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application to Pipe Watercourse' 'definition of River Under the Water Management Act 2000' 'integrated Development' 'controlled Activity' 'ecologically Sustainable Development' 'riparian Protection']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal Following Refusal of Development Application Da0415/08 to Pipe an Existing Open Channel Watercourse / Section 34 Conciliation Conference Terminated; Parties Agreed to Adjudication Under S 34(4)(b) of the Land and Environment Court Act 1979; Judgment Under S 34(5)
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the watercourse at 27 Miowera Road proposed to be piped was a natural watercourse or an artificially created channel' 'Whether, if natural, the watercourse constituted a river under the Water Management Act 2000' 'Whether the proposal to insert a concrete pipe in the watercourse had merit having regard to ecological and physical impacts and the planning and broader environmental objectives for the area']
Ratio Decidendi
On the balance of the evidence, including site observations, aerial photographs, topography, hydrological modelling, bed and bank features, erosion features, flow, sediment processes, aquatic fauna and prior riparian vegetation, the watercourse at 27 Miowera Road was a natural feature artificially modified and a river under the Water Management Act 2000. The development application therefore required treatment as integrated development and involved a controlled activity, lacked support from the Department of Water and Energy, and in any event was inconsistent with ecologically sustainable development, the objects and principles of the Water Management Act 2000, DCP 38, DCP 47 and Council...
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed; development consent refused
Orders
- ['The appeal is dismissed' 'Development Application DA0415/08 for consent to pipe the watercourse at 27 Miowera Road is determined by the refusal of development consent' 'The exhibits are to be returned']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment