Ex Parte Nelson (No 2) [1929] HCA 14
The High Court held that either the case did not involve a question as to the limits inter se of Commonwealth and State powers under s 74, or, if it did, no special reasons were shown warranting the grant of a certificate for appeal to the Privy Council.
- Parties
- Applicant: Nelson; Respondent: Magistrate and Informants (including Oscar Ernest Edward Couch)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 31 May 1929
- Procedural Posture
- Motion for Certificate Under S 74 Constitution to Appeal to Privy Council / Post Conviction, Post Discharge of Rules Nisi, High Court Determination of Certificate Application
- Outcome
- Applications for certificates under s 74 Constitution refused.
- Legal Topics
- Limits Inter Se of Commonwealth and State Powers, Appeals to Privy Council, Freedom of Inter State Trade and Commerce
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nelson
Applicant
Magistrate and Informants (including Oscar Ernest Edward Couch)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Motion for Certificate Under S 74 Constitution to Appeal to Privy Council / Post Conviction, Post Discharge of Rules Nisi, High Court Determination of Certificate Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the decision in Ex parte Nelson (No. 1) involved a question as to the limits inter se of the constitutional powers of the Commonwealth and the State of New South Wales under s 74 of the Constitution
- 2 Whether there are special reasons to grant a certificate for appeal to the Privy Council under s 74 Constitution
Ratio Decidendi
The High Court held that either the case did not involve a question as to the limits inter se of Commonwealth and State powers under s 74, or, if it did, no special reasons were shown warranting the grant of a certificate for appeal to the Privy Council.
Court Disposition
Applications for certificates under s 74 Constitution refused.
Orders
- Applications for certificates refused.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment