Cavric v Coopers Lybrand (ACT) Ltd & Anor [2002] NSWSC 538
The plaintiff did not demonstrate special reasons for discovery as required under the rules for personal injury claims, nor necessity for interrogatories to dispose fairly of the matter. Accordingly, the applications for further discovery and interrogatories were refused.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 19 June 2002
- Procedural Posture
- Personal Injury / Review of Registrar's Decision on Discovery and Interrogatories
- Outcome
- Review dismissed; orders of Assistant Registrar Howe affirmed; costs to defendants.
- Legal Topics
- ['discovery' 'interrogatories' "review of Registrar's Decisions" 'workplace Psychiatric Injury']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Personal Injury / Review of Registrar's Decision on Discovery and Interrogatories
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the plaintiff has demonstrated 'special reasons' for an order for discovery under Part 23 r 5 of the Supreme Court Rules in a personal injury claim" 'Whether it is necessary to administer interrogatories under Part 24 r 5 of the Supreme Court Rules']
Ratio Decidendi
The plaintiff did not demonstrate special reasons for discovery as required under the rules for personal injury claims, nor necessity for interrogatories to dispose fairly of the matter. Accordingly, the applications for further discovery and interrogatories were refused.
Court Disposition
Review dismissed; orders of Assistant Registrar Howe affirmed; costs to defendants.
Orders
- ['The decision of Assistant Registrar Howe dated 29 April 2002 in relation to discovery and interrogatories is affirmed.' 'The notice of motion dated 1 May 2002 is dismissed.' "The plaintiff is to pay the defendants' costs as agreed or assessed."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment