Charalambous v Yeung (No 2) (RLD) [2014] NSWCATAP 1

Charalambous v Yeung (No 2) (RLD) [2014] NSWCATAP 1

It was fair to order the appellant to pay the respondent's costs at first instance from 31 January 2013 and the costs of the appeal because the appellant unreasonably rejected a genuine offer of $40,000 (inclusive of costs) shortly before hearing—an offer substantially more favourable than the outcome. The short acceptance period did not make rejection reasonable, in light of established authorities and circumstances.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
24 January 2014
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Costs Decision After Unsuccessful Claim at First Instance and Dismissal of Appeal
Outcome
The appellant is ordered to pay the respondent's costs at first instance (from 31 January 2013) and on appeal, as assessed or agreed on a party-party basis.
Legal Topics
['costs' 'appeals' 'offers of Compromise' 'party Party Costs' 'rejection of Settlement Offers']
['retail Leases' 'tribunal Procedure'] ['costs' 'appeals' 'offers of Compromise' 'party Party Costs' 'rejection of Settlement Offers']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Costs Decision After Unsuccessful Claim at First Instance and Dismissal of Appeal

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ["Whether the appellant should pay the respondent's costs at first instance from 31 January 2013 onward and on appeal, in light of an unreasonably rejected offer of compromise"]

Ratio Decidendi

It was fair to order the appellant to pay the respondent's costs at first instance from 31 January 2013 and the costs of the appeal because the appellant unreasonably rejected a genuine offer of $40,000 (inclusive of costs) shortly before hearing—an offer substantially more favourable than the outcome. The short acceptance period did not make rejection reasonable, in light of established authorities and circumstances.

Court Disposition

The appellant is ordered to pay the respondent's costs at first instance (from 31 January 2013) and on appeal, as assessed or agreed on a party-party basis.

Orders

  • ["The Appellant is to pay the Respondent's costs at first instance as from 31 January 2013, as assessed or agreed on a party-party basis." "The Appellant is to pay the Respondent's costs of the appeal proceedings, as assessed or agreed on a party-party basis."]