Ozmen Entertainment Group Pty Ltd v Neptune Hospitality Pty Ltd (No 6) [2020] FCA 288

Ozmen Entertainment Group Pty Ltd v Neptune Hospitality Pty Ltd (No 6) [2020] FCA 288

Terry Borella's repeated non-compliance with multiple court orders and failure to provide adequate explanation for his delays justified permanently staying his claim against the former receivers. The former receivers' agreed remuneration and expenses were reviewed and found appropriately quantified, warranting their...

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
14 February 2020
Procedural Posture
Interlocutory Application in General Civil Proceeding / Determination of Interlocutory Applications Regarding Receivers' Remuneration and Claim by Terry Borella
Outcome
Terry Borella's interlocutory application dismissed; claim against former receivers permanently stayed due to default; former receivers' remuneration approved; costs awarded against Mr Borella.
Legal Topics
["approval of Receivers' Remuneration" 'permanent Stay of Claims' 'non Compliance With Court Orders' 'case Management' 'costs Orders']
['civil Procedure' 'receivership' 'admiralty and Maritime'] ["approval of Receivers' Remuneration" 'permanent Stay of Claims' 'non Compliance With Court Orders' 'case Management' 'costs Orders']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Interlocutory Application in General Civil Proceeding / Determination of Interlocutory Applications Regarding Receivers' Remuneration and Claim by Terry Borella

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether Terry Borella should be granted further opportunity to pursue a claim against the former receivers for fees and expenses' "Whether the former receivers' remuneration and expenses should be approved" 'What orders should be made concerning the interlocutory applications of the parties']

Ratio Decidendi

Terry Borella's repeated non-compliance with multiple court orders and failure to provide adequate explanation for his delays justified permanently staying his claim against the former receivers. The former receivers' agreed remuneration and expenses were reviewed and found appropriately quantified, warranting their approval and discharge from further obligations in the proceeding.

Court Disposition

Terry Borella's interlocutory application dismissed; claim against former receivers permanently stayed due to default; former receivers' remuneration approved; costs awarded against Mr Borella.

Orders

  • ["Terry Borella's interlocutory application filed 13 February 2020 dismissed." 'Terry Borella to pay costs of applicants and former receivers for that application.' "Former receivers' remuneration and expenses for 6 July 2019 to 14 February 2020 approved at $91,900, to be paid by applicants in two equal instalments...