Nessdee Pty Limited v Orange City Council [2017] NSWLEC 158
The proposed heliport, as amended and with mitigation measures, will not have unacceptable noise or visual impacts, complies with accepted noise criteria, is a permissible use in the E3 zone, and is justified on the site; accordingly, development consent should be granted subject to finalising conditions and documentation.
- Parties
- Applicant: Nessdee Pty Limited; First Respondent: Orange City Council; Second Respondent: Mr Gavin Alston; Third Respondent: Ms Esme Alston
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Decision
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; proposal for heliport approved subject to conditions being finalised.
- Legal Topics
- Development Consent, Heliport, Acoustic Impacts, Visual Impacts, Environmental Impact Statement, Public Interest, Noise Mitigation, Stormwater Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nessdee Pty Limited
Applicant
Orange City Council
First Respondent
Mr Gavin Alston
Second Respondent
Ms Esme Alston
Third Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Decision
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the proposed heliport would cause unacceptable acoustic impacts on residential amenity and aesthetic values
- 2 Whether visual impacts would be unacceptable
- 3 Adequacy of EIS regarding justification and alternatives
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed heliport, as amended and with mitigation measures, will not have unacceptable noise or visual impacts, complies with accepted noise criteria, is a permissible use in the E3 zone, and is justified on the site; accordingly, development consent should be granted subject to finalising conditions and documentation.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; proposal for heliport approved subject to conditions being finalised.
Orders
- Applicant to prepare, file and serve Plan of Management and Stormwater Management Report by 8 December 2017.
- Parties to agree and file revised conditions of consent by 14 December 2017.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment