TCN Channel Nine Pty Limited v Network Ten Pty Limited (No 2) [2005] FCAFC 53
Copyright in broadcast programmes under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) is infringed when a substantial part of the programme is rebroadcast, assessed qualitatively and quantitatively based on its material significance to the programme. Three extracts rebroadcast by Network Ten were deemed substantial parts and thus infringements: Midday (Prime Minister singing), Australia's Most Wanted (re-enactment), and Pick Your Face (Kerri-Anne Kennerley). Other extracts were insubstantial and did not infringe Nine's copyright.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 26 May 2005
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / On Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia, Full Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- ['copyright Infringement' 'television Broadcast Copyright' 'substantial Part Test' 'copyright Act 1968 (cth) Part Iv' 'qualitative Vs Quantitative Assessment']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / On Appeal From a Single Judge of the Federal Court of Australia, Full Court
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether extracts rebroadcast by Network Ten infringed Nine's copyright in television broadcasts under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)" "Whether the extracts constituted a 'substantial part' of Nine's programmes" 'Proper approach to the substantiality test for broadcast copyright under Australian law']
Ratio Decidendi
Copyright in broadcast programmes under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth) is infringed when a substantial part of the programme is rebroadcast, assessed qualitatively and quantitatively based on its material significance to the programme. Three extracts rebroadcast by Network Ten were deemed substantial parts and thus infringements: Midday (Prime Minister singing), Australia's Most Wanted (re-enactment), and Pick Your Face (Kerri-Anne Kennerley). Other extracts were insubstantial and did not infringe Nine's copyright.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part
Orders
- ['The appeal be allowed in part.' "The respondent pay two thirds of the appellants' costs of that part of the appeal disposed of on 22 May 2002 and the part hereby disposed of." "Declaration that the respondent infringed the appellants' broadcast copyright in relation to the following extracts: The Inaugural Allan...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment