Network Ten Pty Limited v TCN Channel Nine Pty Limited [2004] HCA 14
A television broadcast, for the purposes of copyright infringement under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), refers to the aggregate of visual images and sounds constituting a program, advertisement, or discrete segment presented to the public, rather than any singular visual image—so infringement requires that at least a substantial part of such identified broadcast material has been reproduced, not simply any individual image or sound.
- Parties
- Appellant: Network Ten Pty Limited; Respondents: TCN Channel Nine Pty Limited & Ors
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 11 March 2004
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / High Court Appeal From Full Court of the Federal Court
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed in part; orders of Full Court set aside and matter remitted to Full Court to determine outstanding issues.
- Legal Topics
- Copyright Infringement, Television Broadcasting Rights, Statutory Interpretation, Television Broadcasts as Subject Matter, Substantial Part in Copyright
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Network Ten Pty Limited
Appellant
TCN Channel Nine Pty Limited & Ors
Respondents
Procedural Posture
Appeal / High Court Appeal From Full Court of the Federal Court
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the subject-matter of copyright protection in a television broadcast under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth)?
- 2 Does infringement require taking of a 'substantial part' of the broadcast or does copying any visual image or sound constitute an infringement under sections 87(a) and 87(c)?
- 3 How should the phrase 'a television broadcast' be construed in the context of copyright infringement?
Ratio Decidendi
A television broadcast, for the purposes of copyright infringement under the Copyright Act 1968 (Cth), refers to the aggregate of visual images and sounds constituting a program, advertisement, or discrete segment presented to the public, rather than any singular visual image—so infringement requires that at least a substantial part of such identified broadcast material has been reproduced, not simply any individual image or sound.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed in part; orders of Full Court set aside and matter remitted to Full Court to determine outstanding issues.
Orders
- Appeal allowed with costs.
- Orders of the Full Court of the Federal Court entered on 19 July 2002 set aside.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment