Wilson v State of South Australia [2017] FCA 219
A decision to replace applicants under s 66B of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) does not amount to joining or removing a party under s 24(1AA)(b)(i) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), and Mr Wilson failed to establish standing to commence the proposed appeal as agent for Ms Wilson; therefore, the applications must be dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 09 March 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time Following Judgment Replacing Applicants in Native Title Proceedings
- Outcome
- Application dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['appeals' 'standing' 'joinder and Removal of Parties' 'representative Proceedings' 'substitution of Applicants']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Leave to Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal and Extension of Time Following Judgment Replacing Applicants in Native Title Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether a decision made under s 66B of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) is a decision to join or remove a party for the purposes of s 24(1AA)(b)(i) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth)' 'Whether the applicant (Mr Paul K Wilson, as agent for Neva Wilson) has standing to commence the proposed appeal']
Ratio Decidendi
A decision to replace applicants under s 66B of the Native Title Act 1993 (Cth) does not amount to joining or removing a party under s 24(1AA)(b)(i) of the Federal Court of Australia Act 1976 (Cth), and Mr Wilson failed to establish standing to commence the proposed appeal as agent for Ms Wilson; therefore, the applications must be dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed
Orders
- ['The application is dismissed.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment