New South Wales Cremation Company Pty Limited v Valuer General [2016] NSWLEC 135
The proper methodology for valuing the unimproved value of the subject land, a crematorium with memorial gardens, is a comparable sales approach given the existence of relevant cemetery land sales, the subject-matter's characteristics, and the unreliability of the residual land value approach. Scattered and interred...
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 October 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- ['unimproved Value' 'valuation Methodology' 'improvement Definitions' 'cemetery and Crematorium Land' 'comparable Sales Approach']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether memorial gardens and related structures constitute 'improvements' under relevant legislation for valuation purposes" 'What is the correct methodology for determining the unimproved value of land leased for crematorium use under the Rookwood Lease' 'Whether a residual land value or comparable sales approach is more appropriate in the circumstances']
Ratio Decidendi
The proper methodology for valuing the unimproved value of the subject land, a crematorium with memorial gardens, is a comparable sales approach given the existence of relevant cemetery land sales, the subject-matter's characteristics, and the unreliability of the residual land value approach. Scattered and interred ashes are not improvements, but structures, gardens and plaques are improvements. Adjusted comparable sales evidence supports an unimproved value of $11,750,000 as at 1 July 2015.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- ['Value of the unimproved subject land is determined to be $11,750,000 as at 1 July 2015.' 'Proceedings dismissed; parties to confer on orders and, failing agreement, matter to be relisted for submissions on final orders.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment