Application of the New South Wales Crime Commission; In the matter of Tian [2022] NSWSC 899
Restraining orders are appropriate based on suspicion of money laundering and justified by material presented; ancillary examination orders are refused where criminal charges are extant and should be made on notice.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 June 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Application Ex Parte / Short Minutes of Order; Orders Made
- Outcome
- Orders 1, 2, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12 and 13 made in accordance with short minutes of order filed by plaintiff on 17 June 2022.
- Legal Topics
- ['confiscation of Proceeds of Crime' 'restraining Orders' 'examination Orders' 'ancillary Orders' 'money Laundering']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application Ex Parte / Short Minutes of Order; Orders Made
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether restraining orders pursuant to s 10A of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW) should be made' 'Whether ancillary orders for examination on oath and provision of financial statements should be made in circumstances of extant or potential criminal proceedings']
Ratio Decidendi
Restraining orders are appropriate based on suspicion of money laundering and justified by material presented; ancillary examination orders are refused where criminal charges are extant and should be made on notice.
Court Disposition
Orders 1, 2, 6, 7, 10, 11, 12 and 13 made in accordance with short minutes of order filed by plaintiff on 17 June 2022.
Orders
- ['Order 1 as per short minutes' 'Order 2 as per short minutes' 'Order 6 as per short minutes' 'Order 7 as per short minutes' 'Order 10 as per short minutes' 'Order 11 as per short minutes' 'Order 12 as per short minutes' 'Order 13 as per short minutes']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment