NSW Crime Commission v Brendon Phong Tran (No 3) [2014] NSWSC 1393

It is appropriate to vary the restraining order in the terms agreed by the parties, permitting payment of money owing to the Water Corporation in relation to property specified in Schedule 2.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 26 September 2014
Procedural Posture: Proceedings Under the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (nsw) / Variation of Restraining Order Sought by Consent
Outcome: Orders sought made
Legal Topics: ['restraining Orders' 'variation of Restraining Orders' 'consent Orders']

['criminal Law'] ['restraining Orders' 'variation of Restraining Orders' 'consent Orders']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Proceedings Under the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (nsw) / Variation of Restraining Order Sought by Consent

Legal Issues

1 ['Whether the restraining order against the fourth defendant should be varied to permit payment of money owing to the Water Corporation']

Ratio Decidendi

It is appropriate to vary the restraining order in the terms agreed by the parties, permitting payment of money owing to the Water Corporation in relation to property specified in Schedule 2.

Court Disposition

Orders sought made

Orders

['The restraining order against the fourth defendant is varied as agreed by the parties to permit payment to the Water Corporation']