New South Wales Crime Commission v Lee & Ors [2017] NSWSC 1503
The motion to set aside consent orders is stayed by s 471B Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) due to the winding up of the company, and given failure to seek leave and the weakness of arguments for setting aside consent, the motion should be dismissed for want of due dispatch and prosecution.
- Parties
- Applicant: New South Wales Crime Commission; First Respondent: Mr Do Young (aka Jason) Lee; Second Respondent: Mr Seong Won Lee; Third Defendant: J & Lee Property Investment Group Pty Ltd (in liquidation)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 November 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Application to Dismiss Motion for Want of Due Dispatch and Prosecution
- Outcome
- Notice of Motion dismissed for want of due dispatch and prosecution; respondents to pay applicant's costs
- Legal Topics
- Summary Disposal, Dismissal of Motion, Consent Orders, Stay of Proceedings, Statutory Stay
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
New South Wales Crime Commission
Applicant
Mr Do Young (aka Jason) Lee
First Respondent
Mr Seong Won Lee
Second Respondent
J & Lee Property Investment Group Pty Ltd (in liquidation)
Third Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Application to Dismiss Motion for Want of Due Dispatch and Prosecution
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the motion to set aside consent orders should be dismissed for want of due dispatch and prosecution
- 2 Whether the statutory stay under s 471B Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) applies to the motion to set aside consent orders
- 3 Whether arguments to set aside final consent orders are arguable or vitiate consent
Ratio Decidendi
The motion to set aside consent orders is stayed by s 471B Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) due to the winding up of the company, and given failure to seek leave and the weakness of arguments for setting aside consent, the motion should be dismissed for want of due dispatch and prosecution.
Court Disposition
Notice of Motion dismissed for want of due dispatch and prosecution; respondents to pay applicant's costs
Orders
- Under r 2.7 Uniform Civil Procedure Rules 2005 (NSW), the Notice of Motion filed by Jason Lee and Seong Won Lee on 13 July 2017 is dismissed for want of due dispatch and prosecution.
- The Lees are to pay the Commission's costs of the application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment