New South Wales Crime Commission v Power [2020] NSWSC 1528

New South Wales Crime Commission v Power [2020] NSWSC 1528

On the evidence, the Commission established reasonable grounds for suspicion of serious crime related activity by Mr Power, enabling the Court to grant a restraining order and ancillary orders ex parte under the Act.

Source-derived case information.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
02 October 2020
Procedural Posture
Application for Restraining Order / Ex Parte Hearing
Outcome
Restraining order and ancillary orders granted ex parte.
Legal Topics
['criminal Assets Recovery' 'restraining Order' 'serious Crime Related Activity']
['criminal Law'] ['criminal Assets Recovery' 'restraining Order' 'serious Crime Related Activity']

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Restraining Order / Ex Parte Hearing

  1. 1 ['Whether the Commission has reasonable grounds to obtain a restraining order ex parte under s 10A and ancillary orders under s 12 of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW)']

Ratio Decidendi

On the evidence, the Commission established reasonable grounds for suspicion of serious crime related activity by Mr Power, enabling the Court to grant a restraining order and ancillary orders ex parte under the Act.

Court Disposition

Restraining order and ancillary orders granted ex parte.

Orders

  • ['Restraining order made under s 10A of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW).' 'Ancillary orders made under s 12 of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW).']