New South Wales Crime Commission v Power [2020] NSWSC 1528
On the evidence, the Commission established reasonable grounds for suspicion of serious crime related activity by Mr Power, enabling the Court to grant a restraining order and ancillary orders ex parte under the Act.
Source-derived case information.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 October 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Restraining Order / Ex Parte Hearing
- Outcome
- Restraining order and ancillary orders granted ex parte.
- Legal Topics
- ['criminal Assets Recovery' 'restraining Order' 'serious Crime Related Activity']
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Restraining Order / Ex Parte Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Commission has reasonable grounds to obtain a restraining order ex parte under s 10A and ancillary orders under s 12 of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
On the evidence, the Commission established reasonable grounds for suspicion of serious crime related activity by Mr Power, enabling the Court to grant a restraining order and ancillary orders ex parte under the Act.
Court Disposition
Restraining order and ancillary orders granted ex parte.
Orders
- ['Restraining order made under s 10A of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW).' 'Ancillary orders made under s 12 of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 (NSW).']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment