New South Wales Crimes Commission v Warren Richards [2010] NSWSC 1399
Reasons should be given for granting ex parte restraining orders under s10A of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990, and the affidavit and factual material provided reasonable grounds for suspicion that Mr Richards engaged in serious crime related activity, mandating the granting of the restraining order.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 30 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Ex Parte Application for Restraining Order / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- Application granted
- Legal Topics
- ['restraining Orders Under Criminal Assets Recovery Act' 'serious Crime Related Activity' 'prohibited Drug Supply']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Ex Parte Application for Restraining Order / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Is the obligation to give reasons for an ex parte restraining order under s10A of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990 present after legislative amendment?' 'Are there reasonable grounds for suspicion that Warren Richards engaged in serious crime related activity as required for a restraining order under s10A?']
Ratio Decidendi
Reasons should be given for granting ex parte restraining orders under s10A of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990, and the affidavit and factual material provided reasonable grounds for suspicion that Mr Richards engaged in serious crime related activity, mandating the granting of the restraining order.
Court Disposition
Application granted
Orders
- ['A restraining order in respect of the property of Mr Warren Richards granted under s10A of the Criminal Assets Recovery Act 1990.' 'Orders for the examination on oath of Mr Richards and Michelle Richards granted.' 'Ancillary orders as sought in paragraphs 4, 5, 6, 7 and 8 of the form of orders provided by Ms...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment