NSW Land and Housing Corporation v Stannard & Anor [2000] NSWSC 681
An entry on a tenant's rent card, recording rent increases, does not constitute sufficient written notice for the purposes of s 45(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1987, because such a record does not, on its face, constitute and purport to give notice of the increase as required by law; therefore, the landlord failed to satisfy the statutory requirements for increasing rent.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 July 2000
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed with costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['rent Increase' 'notice Requirements' 'residential Tenancy Agreements']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether a notation on a tenant's rent card constitutes sufficient written notice of a rent increase under s 45(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1987." 'Whether the landlord had complied with notice requirements before increasing rent and claiming arrears.']
Ratio Decidendi
An entry on a tenant's rent card, recording rent increases, does not constitute sufficient written notice for the purposes of s 45(1) of the Residential Tenancies Act 1987, because such a record does not, on its face, constitute and purport to give notice of the increase as required by law; therefore, the landlord failed to satisfy the statutory requirements for increasing rent.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed with costs.
Orders
- ['Application to the Court be dismissed with costs.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment