News Ltd v Australian Rugby Football League Ltd & Ors [1995] FCA 1060
The statements were rejected because they were sought to be introduced after many witnesses had already been examined and much of the hearing had passed; admitting them would risk expanding the issues too late, make the hearing more complex, and prejudice the opposing parties' ability to deal with the case properly.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 1995
- Procedural Posture
- Evidence Ruling / During Hearing on Tender of Statements
- Outcome
- Tender of statements rejected.
- Legal Topics
- ['admissibility of Evidence' 'judicial Notice' 'late Tender of Evidence' 'natural Justice']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Evidence Ruling / During Hearing on Tender of Statements
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether two statements of Mr J E Pollard should be admitted as evidence at the stage of the hearing at which they were sought to be tendered.' 'Whether the general proposition about breakaway sporting codes should instead be dealt with, if at all, by reference to judicial notice and standard historical sources.']
Ratio Decidendi
The statements were rejected because they were sought to be introduced after many witnesses had already been examined and much of the hearing had passed; admitting them would risk expanding the issues too late, make the hearing more complex, and prejudice the opposing parties' ability to deal with the case properly.
Court Disposition
Tender of statements rejected.
Orders
- ['The statements sought to be introduced are rejected.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment