Newton Denny Chapelle v Ballina Shire Council (No 2) [2014] NSWLEC 183
It is fair and reasonable for the Council to pay the Applicant's costs for the first call-over, and costs arising out of the two Notices of Motion, because the Council was responsible for including irrelevant contentions in its Statement and should have ensured such contentions were subject to proper legal review before filing, leading to unnecessary interlocutory steps.
- Parties
- Applicant: Newton Denny Chapelle; Respondent: Ballina Shire Council
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (class 1, Land and Environment Court) / Costs Determination Following Judgment
- Outcome
- Application for costs granted in general terms, quantum not summarily determined.
- Legal Topics
- Costs in Class 1 Proceedings, Interlocutory Motions, Modification of Development Consent
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Newton Denny Chapelle
Applicant
Ballina Shire Council
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal (class 1, Land and Environment Court) / Costs Determination Following Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether it is fair and reasonable for the Council to pay the Applicant's costs for three interlocutory steps in the proceedings in accordance with Pt 3, r 3.7 of the Land and Environment Court Rules 2007 (NSW)
Ratio Decidendi
It is fair and reasonable for the Council to pay the Applicant's costs for the first call-over, and costs arising out of the two Notices of Motion, because the Council was responsible for including irrelevant contentions in its Statement and should have ensured such contentions were subject to proper legal review before filing, leading to unnecessary interlocutory steps.
Court Disposition
Application for costs granted in general terms, quantum not summarily determined.
Orders
- The Council must pay the costs of the Applicant reserved at the first call-over of the proceedings on 16 December 2013.
- The Council must pay the Applicant's costs associated with the Applicant's Notice of Motion dated and filed 6 February 2014.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment