NGK 2000 Pty Ltd v The Hills Shire Council [2017] NSWLEC 1482
The matter was resolved by agreement between the parties at a conciliation conference; the Commissioner was satisfied under s 34(3) LEC Act that the agreement could have been made by the Court in the proper exercise of its functions, and therefore disposed of the proceedings and set out written orders in line with the agreement without making any merit assessment.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 04 September 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal (class 1) / Conciliation Conference; Final Orders
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; modification to development consent approved as per agreed orders
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'modification Application' 'conciliation Conference' 'section 94 Contributions']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal (class 1) / Conciliation Conference; Final Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether to approve the modification to Condition 38 of Development Consent DA781/2005/HC regarding Section 94 Contributions' 'Whether to uphold the appeal regarding the development application']
Ratio Decidendi
The matter was resolved by agreement between the parties at a conciliation conference; the Commissioner was satisfied under s 34(3) LEC Act that the agreement could have been made by the Court in the proper exercise of its functions, and therefore disposed of the proceedings and set out written orders in line with the agreement without making any merit assessment.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; modification to development consent approved as per agreed orders
Orders
- ['The Appeal is upheld.' "Modification Application DA781/2005/HC/C, seeking a modification to Condition 38 of Development Consent DA781/2005/HC to vary Section 94 Contributions is approved subject to the revised Condition 38 set out at Annexure 'A'." "As a consequence of Orders 1 and 2, Development Consent...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment