Pham v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1946

Pham v Minister for Immigration and Border Protection [2018] FCA 1946

The documents provided by the appellant, specifically the report from Mr Le, did not satisfy the evidentiary requirements in IMMI 12/116 as they did not detail any therapeutic treatment for mental health consistent with the claimed family violence; therefore, the visa application did not include a 'non-judicially determined claim of family violence' and the appeal must be dismissed.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
26 November 2018
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed with costs
Legal Topics
['judicial Review' 'family Violence Evidentiary Requirements' 'partner Visa' 'migration Regulations 1994 (cth)' 'legislative Instruments']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

  1. 1 ['Whether the report from Mr Le and the statutory declaration from Mr Kleynhans met the evidentiary requirements in IMMI 12/116 for a non-judicially determined claim of family violence under the Migration Regulations 1994 (Cth)' "Whether the appellant's visa application included a non-judicially determined claim of family violence within the meaning of the Regulations"]

Ratio Decidendi

The documents provided by the appellant, specifically the report from Mr Le, did not satisfy the evidentiary requirements in IMMI 12/116 as they did not detail any therapeutic treatment for mental health consistent with the claimed family violence; therefore, the visa application did not include a 'non-judicially determined claim of family violence' and the appeal must be dismissed.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed with costs

Orders

  • ['The appeal is dismissed with costs.']