Le v The Australian Capital Territory [1998] FCA 38

Le v The Australian Capital Territory [1998] FCA 38

No grounds were made out for granting injunctive relief since the subject property was protected by the Attorney-General's undertaking not to dispose of it pending appeal, and applicant had no current legal entitlement to possession.

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
27 January 1998
Procedural Posture
Application for Injunction / Decision on Application
Outcome
Application dismissed
Legal Topics
['injunctive Relief' 'forfeiture' 'stay of Orders' "public Trustee's Powers"]
['proceeds of Crime' 'property Law' 'administrative Law'] ['injunctive Relief' 'forfeiture' 'stay of Orders' "public Trustee's Powers"]

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Application for Injunction / Decision on Application

Legal Issues

  1. 1 ['Whether injunctive relief should be granted to restrain eviction from forfeited property pending appeal' 'Whether the court should exercise jurisdiction under section 23 of the Federal Court Act to grant an injunction' 'Whether the actions of the Public Trustee were appropriate in the circumstances']

Ratio Decidendi

No grounds were made out for granting injunctive relief since the subject property was protected by the Attorney-General's undertaking not to dispose of it pending appeal, and applicant had no current legal entitlement to possession.

Court Disposition

Application dismissed

Orders

  • ['The application be dismissed.']