Di Girolamo v Fairfax Media Publications Pty Ltd (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 568
Several pleaded imputations are sufficiently specific and capable of arising from the matters complained of, and will go to the jury. Ambiguity or lack of clarity in certain imputations (e.g., 26(c)) renders them embarrassing or unclear and must be struck out for trial.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 02 April 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Defamation / Pre Trial Rulings on Pleadings/imputations
- Outcome
- Objections to most new imputations rejected; most will go to the jury. Certain imputations struck out for ambiguity or lack of clarity.
- Legal Topics
- ['defamation' 'imputations' 'striking Out Pleadings' 'procedural Rulings']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Defamation / Pre Trial Rulings on Pleadings/imputations
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether pleaded imputations are ambiguous or incapable of arising' 'Whether precise defamatory act or condition is identified in the imputations' 'Significance of the context for imputations']
Ratio Decidendi
Several pleaded imputations are sufficiently specific and capable of arising from the matters complained of, and will go to the jury. Ambiguity or lack of clarity in certain imputations (e.g., 26(c)) renders them embarrassing or unclear and must be struck out for trial.
Court Disposition
Objections to most new imputations rejected; most will go to the jury. Certain imputations struck out for ambiguity or lack of clarity.
Orders
- ['Imputations 6(a), 6(b), 10(a), 10(b), 14(b) (subject to further clarification), 18(a), 22(a), 22(c), 22(d), and 26(b) will go to the jury.' 'Imputation 26(c) struck out.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment