Nicholas Polias v Tobin Ryall [2014] NSWSC 1692
The defendants published defamatory statements imputing that the plaintiff was a thief; the only defence pleaded was substantial truth, which the defendants failed to prove; accordingly, the plaintiff is entitled to compensatory and aggravated damages against each defendant.
- Parties
- Plaintiff: Nicholas Polias; First Defendant: Tobin Ryall; Second Defendant: Andy Hun Wei Lee; Third Defendant: Sandy Jan; Fourth Defendant: Rhys Gould
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2014
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Principal Judgment After Full Trial
- Outcome
- Judgment for the plaintiff
- Legal Topics
- Allegation of Theft, Substantial Truth, Damages, Aggravated Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nicholas Polias
Plaintiff
Tobin Ryall
First Defendant
Andy Hun Wei Lee
Second Defendant
Sandy Jan
Third Defendant
Rhys Gould
Fourth Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Principal Judgment After Full Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the defendants published defamatory material concerning the plaintiff
- 2 Whether the imputations conveyed were substantially true under the Defamation Act 2005
- 3 Whether the plaintiff was entitled to damages and aggravated damages for defamation
Ratio Decidendi
The defendants published defamatory statements imputing that the plaintiff was a thief; the only defence pleaded was substantial truth, which the defendants failed to prove; accordingly, the plaintiff is entitled to compensatory and aggravated damages against each defendant.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the plaintiff
Orders
- First defendant to pay plaintiff $125,000 in damages
- Second defendant to pay plaintiff $130,000 in damages
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment