Prilis v Inner West Council [2018] NSWLEC 1674
The agreement between the parties was a decision the Court could properly make because the development is permissible in the relevant zoning, and as amended, does not detrimentally affect the heritage conservation area.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Final Determination After Conciliation Conference
- Outcome
- Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions; applicant to pay respondent's thrown away costs.
- Legal Topics
- ['development Application' 'residential Dwellings' 'subdivision' 'appeal' 'conciliation Conference']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Final Determination After Conciliation Conference
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the proposed development (demolition, subdivision and residential attached dwellings) is permissible within the zoning' 'Whether the development, as amended, adversely affects the heritage conservation area']
Ratio Decidendi
The agreement between the parties was a decision the Court could properly make because the development is permissible in the relevant zoning, and as amended, does not detrimentally affect the heritage conservation area.
Court Disposition
Appeal upheld; development consent granted subject to conditions; applicant to pay respondent's thrown away costs.
Orders
- ["Leave granted for the Applicant to rely on amended plans and material listed in Annexure 'A'." 'The appeal is upheld.' "Development Application DA201800064 for demolition, construction of 4 attached dwellings, subdivision into 4 Torrens lots and 1 Stratum lot (basement parking) at 51-53 Albert Street, Petersham,...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment