Nicholas Vassiliadis v. Mosman Municipal Council [1998] NSWLEC 83
Failure of the Second Respondents to keep the Applicant informed led to litigation, which could have been avoided if communication had occurred earlier. As relief was achieved only as a result of the proceedings, the Applicant is entitled to an order for costs from the Second Respondents.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 November 1998
- Procedural Posture
- Class 4 Application / Judgment
- Outcome
- Proceedings dismissed; costs awarded to Applicant; undertaking by Second Respondents noted.
- Legal Topics
- ['building Approval' 'demolition Orders' 'costs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Class 4 Application / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether Building Approval No 563/95 issued by the Council was invalid' 'Whether orders should be made for demolition or removal of structures' 'Entitlement to costs']
Ratio Decidendi
Failure of the Second Respondents to keep the Applicant informed led to litigation, which could have been avoided if communication had occurred earlier. As relief was achieved only as a result of the proceedings, the Applicant is entitled to an order for costs from the Second Respondents.
Court Disposition
Proceedings dismissed; costs awarded to Applicant; undertaking by Second Respondents noted.
Orders
- ['The proceedings be dismissed.' "The Second Respondents pay the Applicant's costs." 'The Court notes the undertaking by the Second Respondents to pursue application to the First Respondent No D8.1998.689.1 for approval to demolish a section of concrete block wall and to demolish and remove the said wall within...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment