Widdowson v R [2020] NSWCCA 213
The Court lacked jurisdiction to hear the bail application as no appeal was properly pending before the Court due to failure to file within prescribed time or seek extension; absent jurisdiction, the application must be struck out. Even if jurisdiction existed, the applicant did not demonstrate special or exceptional circumstances justifying bail under s 22 of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW).
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 24 July 2020
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Application for Bail After Conviction and Sentence; Prior Failed Notice of Intention to Appeal; Application Struck Out for Want of Jurisdiction
- Outcome
- Application for bail struck out for want of jurisdiction
- Legal Topics
- ['bail' 'jurisdiction' 'appeals Post Conviction']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Application for Bail After Conviction and Sentence; Prior Failed Notice of Intention to Appeal; Application Struck Out for Want of Jurisdiction
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the Court of Criminal Appeal has jurisdiction to consider a bail application when no appeal is properly pending before it' "Whether the applicant could meet the 'special or exceptional circumstances' test under s 22 of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW)"]
Ratio Decidendi
The Court lacked jurisdiction to hear the bail application as no appeal was properly pending before the Court due to failure to file within prescribed time or seek extension; absent jurisdiction, the application must be struck out. Even if jurisdiction existed, the applicant did not demonstrate special or exceptional circumstances justifying bail under s 22 of the Bail Act 2013 (NSW).
Court Disposition
Application for bail struck out for want of jurisdiction
Orders
- ['Application for bail is struck out for want of jurisdiction']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment