Nichols Constructions Pty Limited v Elphick (No 2) [2015] NSWSC 1822
Although the plaintiff was successful, the application sought an order outside the usual procedural course of hearing all issues in the proceedings and was not without complexity; in all the circumstances, the fair costs outcome was that the costs of the application be the plaintiff's costs in the cause.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 27 November 2015
- Procedural Posture
- Costs / Costs Determination Following Plaintiff's Successful Application for Certain Issues to Be Decided Separately From, and After, All Issues in the Proceedings
- Outcome
- Costs of the application is plaintiff's costs in the cause.
- Legal Topics
- ['costs in the Cause' 'separate Determination of Issues']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Costs / Costs Determination Following Plaintiff's Successful Application for Certain Issues to Be Decided Separately From, and After, All Issues in the Proceedings
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether the successful plaintiff should receive its costs of the application for certain issues to be decided separately from, and after, all issues in the proceedings.']
Ratio Decidendi
Although the plaintiff was successful, the application sought an order outside the usual procedural course of hearing all issues in the proceedings and was not without complexity; in all the circumstances, the fair costs outcome was that the costs of the application be the plaintiff's costs in the cause.
Court Disposition
Costs of the application is plaintiff's costs in the cause.
Orders
- ["Costs of the application be the plaintiff's costs in the cause."]
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment