Combis as liquidator of Seminars International Pty Ltd v Commissioner of Taxation [2009] FCA 1362
The payments made to the Commissioner of Taxation before liquidation were voidable under s 588FF. The Commissioner was required to repay the liquidator. Pursuant to s 588FGA(2), the Commissioner was entitled to indemnity from the company's director for PAYG-related amounts, associated interest, and recoverable costs.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 13 November 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Corporations Winding Up Voidable Transaction / Orders and Reasons for Judgment
- Outcome
- Orders made in favour of the liquidator against the Commissioner, and in favour of the Commissioner against the director.
- Legal Topics
- ['voidable Transaction' "liquidator's Claims Against Commissioner" 'indemnity Under S 588 Fga' 'payg Withholding Liabilities' "director's Liability for Indemnity"]
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Corporations Winding Up Voidable Transaction / Orders and Reasons for Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ['Whether payments made by a company to the Commissioner of Taxation antecedent to liquidation were voidable transactions' 'Whether the Commissioner is entitled to an indemnity against a director under s 588FGA(2)' 'Basis and quantum of indemnity including legal costs and interest']
Ratio Decidendi
The payments made to the Commissioner of Taxation before liquidation were voidable under s 588FF. The Commissioner was required to repay the liquidator. Pursuant to s 588FGA(2), the Commissioner was entitled to indemnity from the company's director for PAYG-related amounts, associated interest, and recoverable costs.
Court Disposition
Orders made in favour of the liquidator against the Commissioner, and in favour of the Commissioner against the director.
Orders
- ['Pursuant to s 588FF of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth), the Commissioner of Taxation to pay the Plaintiff $131,428.02 (inclusive of $5,956.62 interest) within 28 days in full and final satisfaction of the originating process filed 18 June 2009.' 'No order as to costs between Plaintiff and First Defendant.'...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment