Garaty v R [2024] NSWCCA 53

Garaty v R [2024] NSWCCA 53

The sentencing judge acknowledged the applicant's vulnerability, mental health evidence, emotional dependence on Obiekie and subordinate role, but did not make a finding as to her moral culpability and did not substantively engage with the De La Rosa principles when considering general deterrence and denunciation. Because the applicant's offending was consequent to her vulnerability to Obiekie arising from psychological disorders, social isolation and his violent, abusive and controlling behaviour, her moral culpability was reduced, moderating general deterrence and denunciation. This error warranted leave, allowance of the appeal, quashing of the District Court sentence and imposition of...

Jurisdiction
Australia
Judgment Date
19 April 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal Pursuant to S 5(1)(c) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (nsw) From an Aggregate Sentence Imposed in the District Court; Re Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal
Outcome
Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; District Court sentence quashed; applicant resentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment for 7 years with a non-parole period of 3 years and 9 months.
Legal Topics
['appeal Against Sentence' 'importation of Border Controlled Drug' 'commercial Quantity of Methamphetamine' 'general Deterrence' 'denunciation' 'moral Culpability' 'mental Condition and Sentencing' 'abusive Partner and Coercive Relationship' 'manifest Excessiveness']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal Against Sentence / Application for Leave to Appeal Pursuant to S 5(1)(c) of the Criminal Appeal Act 1912 (nsw) From an Aggregate Sentence Imposed in the District Court; Re Sentence in the Court of Criminal Appeal

  1. 1 ["Whether the sentencing judge failed to take into account, in relation to general deterrence and denunciation, the applicant's limited ability to think rationally." 'Whether the sentencing judge failed to take into account, in relation to general deterrence and denunciation, that the applicant was acting at the direction of an abusive partner in committing the offences.' 'Whether the sentence was manifestly excessive.' 'Whether a lesser sentence was warranted on re-sentence.']

Ratio Decidendi

The sentencing judge acknowledged the applicant's vulnerability, mental health evidence, emotional dependence on Obiekie and subordinate role, but did not make a finding as to her moral culpability and did not substantively engage with the De La Rosa principles when considering general deterrence and denunciation. Because the applicant's offending was consequent to her vulnerability to Obiekie arising from psychological disorders, social isolation and his violent, abusive and controlling behaviour, her moral culpability was reduced, moderating general deterrence and denunciation. This error warranted leave, allowance of the appeal, quashing of the District Court sentence and imposition of...

Court Disposition

Leave to appeal granted; appeal allowed; District Court sentence quashed; applicant resentenced to an aggregate term of imprisonment for 7 years with a non-parole period of 3 years and 9 months.

Orders

  • ['Grant leave to appeal;' 'Allow the appeal;' 'Quash the sentence imposed in the District Court on 15 December 2022;' 'In lieu thereof, sentence the applicant to a term of imprisonment for 7 years, backdated to commence on 5 September 2022 and expiring on 4 September 2029, with a non-parole period of 3 years and 9...