Re Estate Jerrard, deceased [2018] NSWSC 781
The Court found that the traditional customary lore of the Nucoorilma Clan of the Gomeroi People, as evidenced by uncontradicted community statements and affidavits, supports distribution of the estate to the person who cared for and raised the deceased; the plaintiff, as primary carer and mother. However, in view of the deceased’s maintained relationship with his father (the defendant), it would not be just and equitable to exclude the father entirely. Therefore, a distribution order was made awarding the defendant a legacy of $39,706.57, with the residue of the estate to go to the plaintiff.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 08 June 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Distribution Order Under Succession Act 2006 (nsw), Part 4.4 / Principal Judgment
- Outcome
- A distribution order under Part 4.4 Succession Act 2006 (NSW) was made in favour of the mother (plaintiff), with a legacy to the father (defendant). Letters of Administration granted to the plaintiff. Orders as to costs made.
- Legal Topics
- ['intestacy' 'distribution of Indigenous Estates' 'distribution Order Under Succession Act 2006 (nsw) Part 4.4' 'proof of Indigenous Laws and Customs']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Distribution Order Under Succession Act 2006 (nsw), Part 4.4 / Principal Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether the laws, customs, traditions and practices of the Nucoorilma Clan of the Gomeroi People require distribution of the deceased's estate to the mother to the exclusion or reduction of the father’s share" "What is 'just and equitable' under section 134(4) of Succession Act 2006 (NSW) in these circumstances" 'Standard and proof for Indigenous law evidence under the Evidence Act 1995 (NSW)']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court found that the traditional customary lore of the Nucoorilma Clan of the Gomeroi People, as evidenced by uncontradicted community statements and affidavits, supports distribution of the estate to the person who cared for and raised the deceased; the plaintiff, as primary carer and mother. However, in view of the deceased’s maintained relationship with his father (the defendant), it would not be just and equitable to exclude the father entirely. Therefore, a distribution order was made awarding the defendant a legacy of $39,706.57, with the residue of the estate to go to the plaintiff.
Court Disposition
A distribution order under Part 4.4 Succession Act 2006 (NSW) was made in favour of the mother (plaintiff), with a legacy to the father (defendant). Letters of Administration granted to the plaintiff. Orders as to costs made.
Orders
- ['A legacy of $39,706.57 is to be paid to the defendant.' 'The residue of the estate, after expenses and costs, is to pass to the plaintiff for her benefit.' 'No interest to accrue on the legacy if paid within six months; interest otherwise payable under s 84A Probate and Administration Act 1898 (NSW).' 'Letters of...
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment