Chapman v Nicolosi (No 2) [2023] NSWCATAP 73
As the original Tribunal made adverse findings of credit on an issue to be retried, the interests of justice require the matter be remitted to a differently constituted Tribunal. The successful appellant is entitled to costs of the appeal, with execution stayed pending outcome of the remitted proceedings.
- Parties
- Appellant: Nigel Christopher Chapman; Respondent: Gail Joy Nicolosi
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 March 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Post Appeal, Consequential Orders
- Outcome
- Remittal to differently constituted Tribunal; costs order for appellant; stay of execution of costs order
- Legal Topics
- Remittal to Differently Constituted Tribunal, Internal Appeal, Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nigel Christopher Chapman
Appellant
Gail Joy Nicolosi
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Post Appeal, Consequential Orders
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the remitted proceedings should be heard by the same Tribunal Senior Member or a differently constituted Tribunal
- 2 Entitlement to costs of the appeal
Ratio Decidendi
As the original Tribunal made adverse findings of credit on an issue to be retried, the interests of justice require the matter be remitted to a differently constituted Tribunal. The successful appellant is entitled to costs of the appeal, with execution stayed pending outcome of the remitted proceedings.
Court Disposition
Remittal to differently constituted Tribunal; costs order for appellant; stay of execution of costs order
Orders
- An oral hearing of the remaining issues is dispensed with.
- The proceedings are remitted to a differently constituted Tribunal.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment