Mansfield v The Queen [2012] HCA 49
The word 'information' in the insider trading prohibitions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) encompasses false information. There is no legislative requirement that the information be true in order for liability to attach; what matters is whether the information is not generally available and would, if made available, be likely to influence the price or value of securities. Consequently, possession and use of false, material, non-public information in trading can constitute a contravention of the insider trading provisions.
- Parties
- Appellant: Nigel Cunningham Swift Mansfield; Appellant: John Kizon; Respondent: The Queen; Respondent: Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (as instructing solicitor for first respondent)
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 14 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal to the High Court From the Supreme Court of Western Australia
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Insider Trading, Definition of 'information' Under Insider Trading Provisions, False Information and Market Conduct, Interpretation of Corporations Act 2001 (cth) Pt 7.10
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nigel Cunningham Swift Mansfield
Appellant
John Kizon
Appellant
The Queen
Respondent
Commonwealth Director of Public Prosecutions (as instructing solicitor for first respondent)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal to the High Court From the Supreme Court of Western Australia
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether 'information' under the Corporations Act insider trading provisions includes false information
- 2 Whether possession of false, non-public information can constitute a contravention of insider trading prohibitions
Ratio Decidendi
The word 'information' in the insider trading prohibitions of the Corporations Act 2001 (Cth) encompasses false information. There is no legislative requirement that the information be true in order for liability to attach; what matters is whether the information is not generally available and would, if made available, be likely to influence the price or value of securities. Consequently, possession and use of false, material, non-public information in trading can constitute a contravention of the insider trading provisions.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal in Matter No P60/2011 dismissed.
- Appeal in Matter No P61/2011 dismissed.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment