Dempster v Comrie [1999] FCA 956
The Court accepted that Mr Dempster's temporary secondment expired on 30 June 1999 and had not been extended by the only person with power to approve an extension. Because the respondents undertook not to transfer Mr Dempster until 1 July 1999, there was no point in granting interlocutory relief, and the application was dismissed.
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 22 June 1999
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Interlocutory Relief / Interlocutory Application and Directions Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for interlocutory relief dismissed; directions hearing adjourned.
- Legal Topics
- ['interlocutory Relief' 'injunctive Relief' 'balance of Convenience' 'temporary Secondment' 'undertaking']
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Procedural Posture
Application for Interlocutory Relief / Interlocutory Application and Directions Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 ["Whether Mr Dempster's current secondment had been extended or would be extended beyond 30 June 1999." 'Whether interlocutory injunctive relief should be granted having regard to the existence of a serious issue to be tried and the balance of convenience.' 'Whether there was any utility in granting interlocutory relief after the respondents undertook not to transfer Mr Dempster until 1 July 1999.']
Ratio Decidendi
The Court accepted that Mr Dempster's temporary secondment expired on 30 June 1999 and had not been extended by the only person with power to approve an extension. Because the respondents undertook not to transfer Mr Dempster until 1 July 1999, there was no point in granting interlocutory relief, and the application was dismissed.
Court Disposition
Application for interlocutory relief dismissed; directions hearing adjourned.
Orders
- ['The application for interlocutory relief be dismissed.' 'The directions hearing be adjourned until 15 July 1999 at 10.15 am.']
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment