RE Djakovic, Nikola EX PARTE Ostojic, Bosko [1996] FCA 1010

In the absence of submissions from the applicant opposing costs, the court ordered that the applicant pay the costs of the petitioning creditor and creditor in person, to be taxed.

Jurisdiction: Australia
Judgment Date: 21 November 1996
Procedural Posture: Bankruptcy / Costs Determination After Dismissal of Application for Annulment
Outcome: Application for annulment dismissed. Applicant to pay costs of petitioning creditor and creditor in person, to be taxed.
Legal Topics: ['costs' 'annulment of Bankruptcy']

['bankruptcy'] ['costs' 'annulment of Bankruptcy']

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 1 Amounts and remedies 1

Procedural Posture

Bankruptcy / Costs Determination After Dismissal of Application for Annulment

Legal Issues

1 ['Who should bear the costs after dismissal of application for annulment of bankruptcy']

Ratio Decidendi

In the absence of submissions from the applicant opposing costs, the court ordered that the applicant pay the costs of the petitioning creditor and creditor in person, to be taxed.

Court Disposition

Application for annulment dismissed. Applicant to pay costs of petitioning creditor and creditor in person, to be taxed.

Orders

['The applicant pay the costs of the petitioning creditor to be taxed.' 'The applicant pay the costs of the creditor in person, Mr Ivan Margitich, to be taxed.']