VALASSIS v NIKOLAIDIS & CO [1996] NSWCA 542
The application for a re-hearing was refused because it was not supported by any new material; the affidavit repeated previous arguments and contained nothing of substance that was new.
- Parties
- Claimant: Mr Valassis; Respondent: Nikolaidis & Co
- Jurisdiction
- Australia
- Judgment Date
- 03 May 1996
- Procedural Posture
- Notice of Motion / Application for Re Hearing
- Outcome
- motion refused with costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 1
Parties
Mr Valassis
Claimant
Nikolaidis & Co
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Notice of Motion / Application for Re Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the application for a re-hearing is supported by new material
Ratio Decidendi
The application for a re-hearing was refused because it was not supported by any new material; the affidavit repeated previous arguments and contained nothing of substance that was new.
Court Disposition
motion refused with costs
Orders
- Motion refused with costs.
- Order to be entered forthwith.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment